Redistricting is a tough sell for some voters
Over the next few weeks, Californians will have an unprecedented chance to reshape their political process - without politicians or judges mucking it up.
But one question worries community activists: Will citizens take full advantage of the opportunity? It's a common refrain among those trying to rally residents to participate in the once-a-decade redrawing of the state's political maps, known as redistricting.
When the state's political boundaries are drawn by politicians, they tend to favor incumbents. That promises to change as a result of ballot measures approved by voters in 2008 and 2010 that shifted the decision-making from elected officials to citizens.
At hearings across the state, including four in the next few days in Northern California, residents can tell the 14-member Citizens Redistricting Commission why they should be grouped into a particular state Assembly, Senate, congressional or state Board of Equalization district. A first draft of proposed district lines is to be released June 10.
The commission wants citizens to define their community to them. It could be anything from saying that they want to be grouped with nearby residents of the same ethnicity to explaining how they and their neighbors identify with a local park or school.
Crucial process
At one recent commission meeting, residents of the high desert city of Antelope Valley (Los Angeles County) showed the panel satellite photos of the region to illustrate how they should be grouped with residents of Kern County.
Even policy wonks admit the process can sound esoteric and daunting. But expressing an opinion is one of the most important things a voter can do. How each district is drawn - and who lives in it - determines how much federal and state money flows to a particular region, and also who represents it.
As the commission described in its redistricting guide for citizens: "When voters with similar interests are drawn into a district together their voices multiply, giving them a greater opportunity to express their views, elect candidates of their choice and hold their leaders accountable."
Changes in the north
Northern California residents need to speak up loudly, say community activists, as they stand to see their political power fade. New census figures show the state's population shifting to the Central Valley and Southern California - which could leave Northern Californians living in radically redrawn districts.
Depending on how the bipartisan commission draws the maps, San Francisco's Asian American community could see its power diminished, for example, or Latinos in the Watsonville farm belt could be grouped in an urban district that doesn't share their concerns about immigration and education.
Redistricting "is only important if you care about money or power," said commission member Cynthia Dai of San Francisco. The panel is charged with redrawing the state's often ridiculed, gerrymandered districts based on the input it hears from Californians. "And there will be big changes ahead for San Francisco," Dai said.
Still, it's tough to get people interested.
"When you talk about it to people, their eyes glaze over," said David Lee, executive director of the Chinese American Voter Education Committee, which has been organizing around the issue for months in San Francisco. "If it's difficult for people like us to understand, imagine how it is for someone else. Or a new immigrant. It's like giving the keys to a race car to someone who just learned to drive."
Diluted power
The problems are of particular concern in communities of color, which historically have seen their power diluted.
With that in mind, the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund has organized 20 redistricting education workshops across the state in recent months.
The group created a website, latinosdrawthelines.org, and weekly webinars and phone banks to try to reach as many people as possible, said Astrid Garcia, the organization's director of state election policy and redistricting.